I was reading, over on Daily Kos, how Joe the Plumber stood up John McCain. At a rally, McCain asked him to stand up, but he wasn't there. Indeed, 2/3 of the crowd were bussed in to inflate McCain's puny numbers. But not Joe.
For a couple of weeks, something has been bothering me about the whole story. Not that Joe (who isn't named Joe) the Plumber (who isn't licensed to be a plumber) would have his taxes raised (he owes back taxes). But that he had to raise these issues at an Obama rally.
Bush is a coward, and hasn't spoken to an unvetted person in years. When he was running for president, both times, he established "free speech zones" so that real people couldn't ask him questions or boo in the wrong places for tv.
McCain, for many years doing really well with "Town Hall" meetings, has abandoned the format he practically invented. It's very hard for an average Joe to ask him a non-talking point question. McCain is adopting W's campaign tactics as well as his politics. He has fallen so far.
Joe the Plumber had to go to Obama for answers. Which he got. Obama spent several minutes talking to him.
Joe is entitled to his opinion about the candidates, but it's clear, again, that Barack Obama listens and it's clear Barack Obama knows his stuff.
Tonight, I'll be at the Clinton/Franken rally at the Mpls Convention Center. It'll be raucus, but fun. I hope to take pictures and do some interviews. It would be nice if I could talk to the candidates and/or Bill Clinton, but I'm not holding out for that honor.
For a couple of weeks, something has been bothering me about the whole story. Not that Joe (who isn't named Joe) the Plumber (who isn't licensed to be a plumber) would have his taxes raised (he owes back taxes). But that he had to raise these issues at an Obama rally.
Bush is a coward, and hasn't spoken to an unvetted person in years. When he was running for president, both times, he established "free speech zones" so that real people couldn't ask him questions or boo in the wrong places for tv.
McCain, for many years doing really well with "Town Hall" meetings, has abandoned the format he practically invented. It's very hard for an average Joe to ask him a non-talking point question. McCain is adopting W's campaign tactics as well as his politics. He has fallen so far.
Joe the Plumber had to go to Obama for answers. Which he got. Obama spent several minutes talking to him.
Joe is entitled to his opinion about the candidates, but it's clear, again, that Barack Obama listens and it's clear Barack Obama knows his stuff.
Tonight, I'll be at the Clinton/Franken rally at the Mpls Convention Center. It'll be raucus, but fun. I hope to take pictures and do some interviews. It would be nice if I could talk to the candidates and/or Bill Clinton, but I'm not holding out for that honor.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-30 06:19 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-30 06:26 pm (UTC)The e-mail announcement has two different links to RSVP, and neither of them actually do anything. I guess it's just for a count. I spoke to Obama HQ a few minutes ago. It's first come, first serve.
Hall A. I bet we won't all fit in.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-30 06:35 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-30 07:06 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-30 08:13 pm (UTC)To put it another way: He has the right to be called whatever he wants, and I have the right to poke fun at him for it.
Further, whatever he's called doesn't obscure my main point, that he is known for talking to Obama, not McCain. That's not a criticism of him, that's a criticism of McCain and his handlers. They should have vetted him a bit more carefully before making him the centerpiece of their campaign...
(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-30 08:44 pm (UTC)I agree, this has nothing to do with his being a scofflaw and that it was inane for McCain to pick him up. So when you've got good arguments, why throw in dumb ones that only detract from your credibility?
(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-30 09:00 pm (UTC)And why do I use lesser arguments in addition to the strong? Piling it on. You live by the sound bite, you die by the sound bite. At this point, I'm not going to give McCain/Palin anything.
Ask me again next week... or better, Jan. 21.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-31 02:56 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-31 06:05 am (UTC)The very fact that Joe the Plumber is Samuel J. on official documents shows that, in the same circumstances, he could be called Samuel "Joe" Wurzelbacher. But that's not how he was introduced to the world. He was a guy on the street who called himself Joe.
Then the media had trouble finding him on lists until they discovered he was legally Samuel, a fact he'd been under no obligation to mention when he was talking to Obama, and they think he's putting one over on them. That's ridiculous.
Like you say, "die by the sound bite." Here we could be nodding in agreement that Joe and McCain both totally munged the taxation issue, and that Joe isn't the salt-of-the-earth type he put himself across as, and instead we're discussing this insinuation that he has no right to call himself "Joe".
(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-31 02:07 pm (UTC)And yet, what I actually said was, "He has the right to be called whatever he wants, and I have the right to poke fun at him for it."
I think we're done with this conversation.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-31 04:48 pm (UTC)This morning I saw him referred to in a newspaper photo caption as: Samuel "Joe the Plumber" Wurzelbacher. I think that answers your objections.
So sure, we can be done with this conversation.